The correct answer is - unequally distributed.
The water on the planet is not distributed equally. Be it the salt water or the fresh water, there's big differences from place to place.
The salt water for example, is much more abundant on the Southern Hemisphere, while it is much less found on the Northern Hemisphere.
The freshwater though, has much bigger differences on much smaller spaces. While places like the northern half of South America or most of Europe are abundant with water, there's places do not have it at all, like the Arabian Peninsula. The Arabian Peninsula actually doesn't have a single stream or river that have a constant flow, while on the other hand, you have a very small country like Macedonia that has over 2,000 streams and rivers on just above 25,000 km².
Hey there
The correct answer is (D)
(D) = <span>people work in sweatshops because it is their best alternative
</span>Those who believe that sweatshops should not be closed down point out that <span> people work in sweatshops because it is their best alternative.
</span>
If<span> people are poor, then </span>sweatshop labor will often<span> be </span>their<span> best option to make money for there family's. </span><span />
Answer: about 3.1 people per square kilometer, but varies with different locations. For example, the Australian Capital Territoy has the largest density of 171 people per sq km, followed bby Victoria (27), New South Wales (9.7), and Tasmania (7.6). Hope this helps :)
Answer:
The Pampas region has a big economic impact as it is the agricultural heart of Latin America.
Explanation:
The Pampas is a region that is mostly comprised of lowlands. Naturally, it is a biome where grasses dominate. The soil is highly fertile and the region as it is is relatively large. Humans have easily seen the potential of the Pampas and spend no time converting it in an agricultural landscape.
Latin America is a region that heavily relies on agriculture, both farming and raising cattle. Large, relatively flat land with fertile soil is excellent for farming, so the Pampas has been heavily exploited for the large-scale production of agricultural goods. Also, raising cattle is among the highest in the world in Latin America and it is constantly growing as a sector, and grasslands are needed to sustain the cattle, so the Pampas again is the place to exploit for it. While this has a big and positive economic impact, the effects on the flora and fauna of the Pampas have been devastating, to say the least.
The answer should be D. Hope that helps?
