1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mote1985 [20]
2 years ago
5

Can someone help me with this?

History
1 answer:
dem82 [27]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

no the U.S. should not have colonies as it can shatter unity all the colonies will do their own thing and can lead to bad thing.

wars will take place more often between the colonies for particular things like a mines.

this could create mass wars and death.

if they had to fight a war they would all be defeated easily and each colonies will do what they feel is right.

if colonies are made in the U.S. it can lead to mostly bad thing. Thus U.S. should not have even a single colony

You might be interested in
What commodity was particularly scarce in Europe after the war
Katarina [22]
The answer would be food 
7 0
2 years ago
An autocray gives the ruler the power to​
sergejj [24]

Autocracy. An autocracy is a system of government in which supreme power is concentrated in the hands of one person, whose decisions are subject to neither external legal restraints nor regularized mechanisms of popular control

4 0
2 years ago
This map shows the Roman Republic in the year 43 BCE. Using this map, which statement regrading the Roman Republic is MOST LIKEL
Leni [432]
A . It explored North America
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"life in the american wilderness was nasty, brutish, and short for the earliest chesapeake settlers." explain.
SVEN [57.7K]
The Chesapeake colonies had people who lived short and nasty lives because of all the diseases and dangers that could end their lives prematurely. This includes things like dysentery or typhoid. They could also get killed by animals or the locals. There was a lot of fighting between the people too because for each woman there were 6 men, so a lot of the men fought for women. Commonly people wouldn't go past their forties at best.
5 0
3 years ago
WHAT IS FRIENDS FOR YOU FOR ME ITS HAPPINESS​
BartSMP [9]

Explanation:

Getting someone who stand in your favour

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Describe the mughals who once lived in india?
    13·1 answer
  • Mon Assessment - WWI -- 2012
    10·1 answer
  • How was The Ancient River Civilization of Mesopotamia SOICIAL ​
    6·2 answers
  • What role did the Jacobins play in the French Revolution? (5 points)
    14·2 answers
  • Which is not an accurate description of the Columbian Exchange and its consequences?
    8·2 answers
  • Madagascar's economy is focused on vanilla, while Saudi Arabia's economy is centered around oil. Why have these
    5·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the Dawes General Allotment Act?
    6·1 answer
  • I’ll add everyone, what’s y’all’s insta username?
    15·2 answers
  • Pls help I need a good grade
    5·1 answer
  • Clues to ecological principles are given in numerous passages of the Bible. A Bible study of ecology actually opens the doors to
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!