Answer:
The factor that would not be an ethical problem is:
b. if others are unable to replicate her findings.
Explanation:
We must keep in mind we were asked to find what is NOT an ethical problem.
Ethics is a system of moral principles. It is what provides us with a sort of moral map, a guide concerning right and wrong, appropriate and inappropriate. <u>When it comes to publishing papers, ethics concerns aspects such as plagiarism, fraudulent publication, authorship etc. In simpler words, an ethical paper should be faithful to the truth.</u>
Options a, c, and d violate ethics in the sense that Dr. Scott would be making up data. She would be lying if she said she conducted a study when she didn't, when she omitted data that contradicted the results she presented, and when she came up with untrue data to support her theory. On the other hand, <u>if she truly conducted the study and truly obtained the results presented, there would be nothing against ethics in her paper. Even if other researches couldn't replicate her findings for some reason, Dr. Scott's paper wouldn't have an ethical problem.</u>
Gets shot by the gas station dude
In preparation for the "Odyssey" that is starting, Chris McCandless donated $24,000 to charities, prepared 5 kilos of rice, and put 123 dollars in his pocket.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Chris McCandless was a young American who decided to leave civilization and live isolated in the wild.
- He did this with almost no correct equipment to face nature and without enough food and water.
- He came from an upper-middle-class family, but he was tired of consumerism and the futility of society, so he decided to start this adventure.
- He did this right after graduating from college. After graduation, he donated $24,000 to charities, prepared 5 kilos of rice, and began his odyssey with $123 in his pocket.
Chris McCandless spent two years living in the wild, keeping in touch with no one, but he died of starvation after that time.
More information about Chris McCandless at the link:
brainly.com/app/ask?q=Chris+McCandless
Answer:
I think its c Sorry if its wrong.
Explanation:
C. Even brave heroes need help from others.
Through deductive reasoning, we can conclude that the theme this passage most supports is that brave heroes also need help, we can see this in Gilgamesh's appeal for his friend's help in the following section: "If we help each other and fight side by side, what harm can come to us?". It is not correct to say that "It is better to face challenges alone." as this expresses the opposite of what Gilgamesh is declaring and we also can't conclude that "Boats that are built to last will never sink." because good preparation doesn't guarantee 100% safety and either way, it wasn't the focus of the passage.
