Answer:
SEE BELOW FOR ANSWER+EXPLANATION
Explanation:
There is a major difference between the Florida Constitution (actually, any State Constitution) and the federal Constitution.
The State Constitutions are broader in their scope as they govern the internal workings of the State. Every State is a self-contained nation that has delegated many of its international powers to a common federal agent (the federal government).
The federal constitution organizes the structure of the administrative agent of the States and directs this agency on how to administer the collective foreign (from the State’s perspective) State’s international powers. Thus the jurisdiction of the United States Government coordinates interstate relations between the Member States, as well as the international relations between the collective of States and foreign powers external to the Union. Certain internal (from the State’s perspective) powers have also been delegated to the federal agency to ensure ease of commerce and interstate relations such as ensuring all States use the same monetary unit and currency, that all States have 12 inches in a foot, 4 quarts to a gallon, that bankruptcy is handled the same way throughout the union so that a citizen of Maine can’t file for bankruptcy in Kansas because the bankruptcy laws are more favorable in Kansas than they are in Maine (compare to how people will incorporate in Delaware or Nevada rather than California or New York for instance as a comparison as to why uniform bankruptcy laws are important when it is governing the cancelation of incurred debts already made.)
State Constitutions have provisions that govern education, beneficial welfare institutions, and a number of other issues that are not found in the federal Constitution because they are outside the scope of the federal government (although in today’s world it can sometimes be hard to tell).
PLEASE MARK BRANLIEST BECAUSE I HELPED YOU OUT. TYSM. GOD BLESS YOU
The Great Compromise <em>(Or the Connecticut Compromise of July 16, 1787) </em>was a compromise began by Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth, in which <u>it was stablished a Congress representation bicameral system</u>, compound of the Senate and the House of Representatives, where in the Senate it'd be assigned an equal seats number by state, but in the House of Representatives, there would be assigned a seats number according to each state population proportion.
And the Great Compromise was compared to the Virginia and New Jersey Plans, <u>because that Compromise arised from a disccordance between the Virginia Plan</u> <em>(Or the James Maddison's plan) </em><u>and the New Jersey Plan </u><em>(Or the Paterson’s New Jersey Plan)</em> that were presented in the Convention of May 14 to September 17, 1787, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Moreover, the Virginia Plan proposed important changes in the Congress structure, stablishing a Bicameral system, but by other side the New Jersey plan was based in the confederation articles, stablishing an Unicameral congress System, so to resolve those diferences, on June 11, 1787, Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth <u>proposed the Connecticut Compromise, where were included proposals from both plans.</u>
The answer is d or maybe it’s c
