They are called "frozen horses" because they are like a trojan horse (it looks like something innocent but when you open it, it attacks) and it freezes the system
From the start, I dislike it due to the formatting. Never write Introductory, Body, Conclusion. It's one essay, not an executive summary. In your introduction, you do not have a clear thesis. Although "Yay! And the..." may seem witty, it comes off more as silly. I actually like the first sentence of your second paragraph "For as long...before academics." as a better thesis. Remember that your introduction introduces your essay.
I would give your examples through a third person narrative. You want to approach your argument from an unbiased perspective and that means not say "I believe". Yes, we understand that this is your viewpoint, you're the person writing this essay, right? :P
In your body paragraphs, all I can say is make your ideas more consise and then explain why they are relivant. You may need to get some better examples. Why are these examples important? Why should the reader care? Don't use trigger words like "many" or "a lot", but rather give exact examples and numbers.
With the conclusion, whoever taught you that it OK to start a sentence with "But"?! Your English teacher should know better than that. :P
If I were you, I would proof read your work. There are a few grammatical errors that need to be fixed and some things that should be reworded.
Hope that was of some help to you! :)
Answer:
<em>B) </em><em>Even art is affected by the ravages of time.
</em>
Explanation:
This text talks about the glories of art and how they can bring an indescribable joy when they are conceived, but speaks also of how they can be affected by the passage of time, losing part of their mysticism, which is represented in the text as a shadow casted on these feelings by the passage of time.
The first time i went swimming was at my grandmother's house. i was never really close to her but we did have some good memories.
Answer and Explanation:
Hello. You did not provide the text to which the question refers, which prevents the examples and textual evidence from being accurate.
Although the three people mentioned in the question above fought for civil rights and an end to racism and discrimination against blacks, they had different opinions on how this fight should be carried out.
Rosa Parks was in favor of civil disobedience and the refusal of blacks to submit to what whites imposed on them. However, Rosa did not engage in violent movements, nor did she blame them, for her the purpose justified the means, provided that the rights of blacks were taken care of.
Martin Luther King advocated a peaceful struggle, without violent methods and cherishing the safety and peace of all involved. He believed that freedom and rights are not fought for by provoking violence, as it destroys everything good that can happen.
Malcolm X, on the other hand, defended an armed struggle, where civil rights would be enforced in the country, through not only civil disobedience, but violence for those who tried to prevent blacks from gaining their rights.