The consequences of not applying for funding for your studies may be advantageous or disadvantageous as the case may be.
<h3>Consequences of not applying for funding for one's studies</h3>
A major disadvantage of one not applying for funding for one study is that; If one doesn’t apply for financial aid from the college or university one wishes to attend, then one must pay the full cost of attending that institution from one’s own resources. However, a major advantage of not applying for funding for your studies is that the individual doesn't have to repay student loans after school and hence, doesn't accumulate debt.
Read more on funding for academic studies;
brainly.com/question/26722861
Using the image attached. The option that shows the marginal rate of substitution is option b.
<h3>What is marginal rate of substitution?</h3>
The marginal rate of substitution (MRS) is known to be the number of a good that a consumer is said to be willing to take in when compared to another good, only if the new good is said to be equally satisfying.
The marginal rate of substitution (MRS) is also described as the rate in which a specific units of an item is said to be replaced by another only if by giving the same amount of satisfaction to its consumer.
Hence, The MRS concept tells about the association between the taking in of two goods or resources if consumers are said to make rational decisions.
Hence, the option that satisfy the above is option B. Therefore, Using the image attached. The option that shows the marginal rate of substitution is option b.
Learn more about Marginal Rate from
brainly.com/question/20595808
#SPJ1
Answer:
Answer is B. Military service
Explanation:
Answer is B. Military service
Answer:
“Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.
“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.
Explanation: