Answer:
4.11 miles.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the image that I am going to attach we can see the description of the statement in a graph, now, the right triangle is formed, and we can apply Pythagoras, and the hypotenuse would be equal to:
(5 ^ 2 + x ^ 2) ^ (1/2)
The speed is equal to:
V = d / t, therefore the time is t = d / V, the total time would then be:
total time = (5 ^ 2 + x ^ 2) ^ (1/2) / 3 + (7-x) / 6
we derive with respect to x, and we are left with:
dt / dx = x / (3 * (5 ^ 2 + x ^ 2) ^ (1/2)) - 1/6 = 0
x / (3 * (5 ^ 2 + x ^ 2) ^ (1/2)) = 1/6
6x / (3 = (5 ^ 2 + x ^ 2) ^ (1/2)
(2 * x) ^ 2 = (5 ^ 2 + x ^ 2)
4 * x ^ 2 = 25 + x ^ 2
3 * x ^ 2 = 25
x ^ 2 = 25/3
x = 2.88
now we replace
7 - x = 7 - 2.89 = 4.11
In other words, the answer is 4.11 miles.
Yes, there is statistical evidence that the drug is effective in reducing infarct size because p-value is less than the significance value.
<h3>
How to find hypothetical Evidence?</h3>
Let us first define the hypotheses;
Null Hypothesis; H₀: µ = 25
Alternative Hypothesis; H₁: µ < 25
Standard Deviation; σ = 10
Sample mean; x' = 16
Sample size; n = 8
z-score is;
z = (16 - 25)/(10/√8)
z = -2.55
From online z-score table, the p-value is 0.005
Since p-value is less than the significance value, then we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the drug is effective in reducing infarct size.
Read more about Hypothetical Evidence at; brainly.com/question/875167
#SPJ1
Answer:
<u>Yes</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>it</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>right</u><u>.</u><u> </u>
<u>Using</u><u> </u><u>pythagoras</u><u> </u><u>theorum</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>we</u><u> </u><u>found</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>side</u><u> </u><u>to</u><u> </u><u>be</u><u> </u><u>10</u><u>.</u><u> </u>
<u>So</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>perimeter</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>4</u><u> </u><u>times</u><u> </u><u>1</u><u>0</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>i.e</u><u>.</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>4</u><u>0</u>