Answer:
The correct option is;
The situation shows correlation without causation
Step-by-step explanation:
The given data are;
Weight y
Miles Per Gallon
42
18
36
12
30
6
.
x
24
0
The first difference of the data = 42 - 36 = 36 - 30 = 30 - 24 = 6
18 - 12 = 12 - 6 = 6 - 0 = 6
The first difference of the data is constant and equal to 6
Therefore, the graph is a straight line graph with y-intercept = 24 and slope given by the rate of change of the weight to the miles per gallon of fuel consumption as follows;
The rate of change of the weight to the miles per gallon of fuel consumption is given as follows;
(42 - 24)/(18 - 0) = 1
Therefore, the points of the data fit into the straight line and the data of the situation shows correlation
In order to show causation, and to rule out other possible causes for the rise in MPG, a separate experiment will be required whereby the cause for the rise in MPG can be determined.
Use Pythagorean theorem for side1 = a, side2 = 3, and hypotenuse = 2a
a² + b² = c²
a² + (3)² = (2a)
a² + 9 = 4a²
9 = 3a²
3 = a²
√3 = a
side1 = a = √3 ft
side2 = 3 ft (this was given in the problem)
hypotenuse = 2a = 2√3 ft
1 cm : 50.
7x50=350
+
0.3x50=15 = 315. The actual distance is 315 miles.(?)
(?)-The other measurement wasn't given.
Answer:
No they don't show direct variation because if you get y alone, the equation you get is in slope intercept form instead of direct variation.
Step-by-step explanation
direct variation: y=kx
y-x=4
+x +x
y= 4+x
Not Direct Variation
the answer for this is 1296.