The correct answer is yet
Answer:
Dystopian fiction exaggerates existing problems in our reality to show readers what could happen if society continues down a certain path like taking its "quest for perfection too far".
Explanation:
In Shelby Ostergaard's informational text "Someone Might Be Watching- An Introduction to Dystopian Fiction", the author claims how dystopian worlds are not a faraway idea of humanity. Considering the wants and constant pressure of humanity to achieve further advancement and development might as well bring upon the fictional world of a dystopia that has been the work of only writers.
This possibility of attaining a dystopian world is not a far fetched idea. Though just a work of fiction, these presentations of a world where there is loss of liberty, individuality and misinformation are a much nearer reality of man's current situation. Aside from the present issues of scientific progress and even the dark side of any research on the scientific and health, man seems to want more better things, which is reasonable. Man's wants are impossible to be fulfilled, for they want something or the other even after gaining what they want in the first place. Likewise, the unwarranted wants of man for perfection may lead to the fictionalized worlds of dystopian society which we have, till now, seen only in the books. The writer ends the text with a warning about what or how <em>"the world might look like if we take our quest for perfection too far"</em>, just as a fun-house mirror shows the 'unnoticed' flaws of a person.
Answer:
B. Disjunction.
Explanation:
To answer this question we need to know what disjunction means.
<u>When two statements are connected with the word 'or', the new statement is called </u><u>a disjunction.</u><u> In other words, a disjunction is a compound sentence formed by using the word 'or' to join two simple sentences. </u>
As for other options:
- A conjunction is wrong because it would connect the statements with 'and'
- Conditional is wrong because it would connect the statements with 'if'
- The converse is wrong because it would connect the statements with 'no'.
I hope it helped you :)
Answer:
I. A routine medical check-up is advisable at least once a year.
II. The authorities will revoke your license if you get another speeding ticket.
III. The distraught man kept raving until finally he was led away.
IV. They are going to raze this building to make way for the highway.
V. The raw forces of the townspeople were no match for the well-trained invaders.
Pls mark as brainliest <3
Answer
Ismail proceeded to obey as if that were the least improbable order in all the world.
It is by no means improbable that this process had its share in producing the results.
There is nothing improbable in the statement that Taliesin dwelt in Brittany in the sixth century.
In any case it is not improbable that the image may be faulty and as a consequence his appreciation of present...
i gave three pick ur fav
