Answer:
(C) Where a particular event has affected the desirability of the property
Explanation:
A stigmatized property is one that has been psychologically impacted by an event that occurred on the property or one that has been suspected to have occurred on that property. Such a property is now "stigmatized" because such an event will have a drastic effect on multiple values and aspects of the property.
Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
According to the BrandZ model, "Bonded" consumers at the lower levels of the pyramid build stronger relationships with and spend more on the brand than those at the top. This is a false statement. True statement is, according to the BrandZ model, "Bonded" consumers at the top level of the pyramid build stronger relationships with and spend more on the brand than those at the top. This bonding is created in the very last step which is the ultimate result of the
Presence
Relevance
Performance
&
Advantage step, therefore the order becomes this:
Presence
Relevance
Performance
Advantage
&
Bonding.
Answer:
Baruch Shemtov's product is tie
Explanation:
Baruch Yehudah Shemtov was born on September 22, 1987.
Baruch has passionate about the design and the fashion from his young age, he was launched his first line of ties at just age 15 years.
he is a fashion entrepreneur since his junior class of high school
Today also Baruch ties routinely sellout in the tony department store and online
Baruch neckties and all accessories are made in USA
and In 2013, he launched boy ties collection and he coordinating with father-son neckties range at Bergdorf Goodman
Answer:
<em>Most definitely, Tony would lose due to the integration clause.</em>
Explanation:
An integration clause <em>requires a short paragraph to be inserted into a written contract to confirm a final deal between two sides.</em>
Since drafting a written contract, it may fail to be fully checked by one of the parties involved to ensure that all provisions are included and that both parties sign the contract, which Tony failed to consider.
If this happens, one party could contend that the other failed to uphold a particular condition or phrase that they consented to verbally.