I loved it. I think it was a great story.
Answer:
The option which best explains how the historical passage might enhance a reader's understanding of the personal narrative is:
B. The historical passage connects the personal experience of planting and harvesting corn with technical information about farming.
Explanation:
We can easily eliminate option A because the passage does not show evidence of why the Wampanoag were once hunter-gatherers. Quite the opposite, instead of gathering they are farming in the passage.
Letter C claims that the story told by the grandfather is more factual. Looking this passage up online, I found the previous lines. The grandfather is actually telling a sort of fantastic story involving Mother Earth and the prairie rabbit. We can also eliminate this option.
Letter D claims that the passage is about modern technology and how it changed the Wampanoag's relationship with their harvest. However, the passage does not mention technology at all.
The best option then seems to be letter B. While the grandfather is talking about his experience with planting and farming, the narrator is describing it in more technical details: the types of crops that were sowed together and why.
Answer:
hahaha i do not miss english gcse
maybe use a metaphor for the whole essay of nature. Or a metaphor that the train is entrancing the people to join it like they are in a trance and they are are incapable of escaping societies expectation of work
Explanation:
I think its c thats what i would put
After Odysseus and his men land on the island of Cicones, his men quickly get carried away with greed and start eating all in sight. Odysseus shows his leadership by convincing his men to escape from the army that is quickly approaching.
