1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rina8888 [55]
2 years ago
9

ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!

History
2 answers:
Nataliya [291]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Aaron Burr

Explanation:

Jefferson and his running mate Aaron Burr each received seventy-three votes. With the votes tied, the election was thrown to the House of Representatives as required by Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.

The Democratic-Republicans' failure to execute their plan to award Jefferson one more vote than Burr resulted in a tie, which necessitated a contingent election in the House of Representatives. Under the terms laid out in the Constitution, the outgoing House of Representatives chose between Jefferson and Burr.

enyata [817]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Burr tied with Jefferson in the electoral college and hesitated to concede the election.

You might be interested in
What did president Johnson do with this land during reconstruction?
Liula [17]

Answer:

Northern anger over the assassination of Lincoln and the immense human cost of the war led to demands for punitive policies. Vice President Andrew Johnson had taken a hard line and spoke of hanging Confederates, but when he succeeded Lincoln as president, Johnson took a much softer position, pardoning many Confederate leaders and former Confederates.[78] Former Confederate President Jefferson Davis was held in prison for two years, but other Confederate leaders were not. There were no trials on charges of treason. Only one person—Captain Henry Wirz, the commandant of the prison camp in Andersonville, Georgia—was executed for war crimes. Andrew Johnson's conservative view of Reconstruction did not include the involvement of blacks or former slaves in government and he refused to heed Northern concerns when Southern state legislatures implemented Black Codes that set the status of the freedmen much lower than that of citizens.[9]

Smith argues that "Johnson attempted to carry forward what he considered to be Lincoln's plans for Reconstruction."[79] McKitrick says that in 1865 Johnson had strong support in the Republican Party, saying: "It was naturally from the great moderate sector of Unionist opinion in the North that Johnson could draw his greatest comfort."[80] Billington says: "One faction, the moderate Republicans under the leadership of Presidents Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson, favored a mild policy toward the South."[81] Lincoln biographers Randall and Current argued that:

It is likely that had he lived, Lincoln would have followed a policy similar to Johnson's, that he would have clashed with congressional Radicals, that he would have produced a better result for the freedmen than occurred, and that his political skills would have helped him avoid Johnson's mistakes.[82]

Historians generally agree that President Johnson was an inept politician who lost all his advantages by unskilled maneuvering. He broke with Congress in early 1866 and then became defiant and tried to block enforcement of Reconstruction laws passed by the U.S. Congress. He was in constant conflict constitutionally with the Radicals in Congress over the status of freedmen and whites in the defeated South.[83] Although resigned to the abolition of slavery, many former Confederates were unwilling to accept both social changes and political domination by former slaves. In the words of Benjamin Franklin Perry, President Johnson's choice as the provisional governor of South Carolina: "First, the Negro is to be invested with all political power, and then the antagonism of interest between capital and labor is to work out the result."[84]

However, the fears of the mostly conservative planter elite and other leading white citizens were partly assuaged by the actions of President Johnson, who ensured that a wholesale land redistribution from the planters to the freedmen did not occur. President Johnson ordered that confiscated or abandoned lands administered by the Freedmen's Bureau would not be redistributed to the freedmen but would be returned to pardoned owners. Land was returned that would have been forfeited under the Confiscation Acts passed by Congress in 1861 and 1862.

Explanation:

hope this helps you please mark me as brainliest

8 0
3 years ago
How did the Greek and Roman versions of democracy differ?
skad [1K]
They belived and worshiped diffrent Gods.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which nation was led by the dictator stalin
alexgriva [62]
The Soviet Union was led by Dictator Stalin through the years 1929-1953
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are civil rights?
sergij07 [2.7K]
For citizens to have equality, political,and social freedom
7 0
3 years ago
Please 100 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST
irina1246 [14]

Answer:

A). Concurrent Power

Explanation:

Did this lesson this year :P

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Read the summary about factory work during the Industrial Revolution.
    11·2 answers
  • Who is the 45th president
    11·2 answers
  • How did the Jay Treaty of 1794 create division within the United States?
    9·2 answers
  • A single machine gun was worth how many rifles? Why
    11·1 answer
  • How does Manifest destiny effects native Americans? Why were Cherokees, and other Natives, forced off their land?
    11·1 answer
  • Aye fam when did martin luther king die
    12·2 answers
  • The rights to vote petition and assembly are all examples of which type of citizens rights
    10·2 answers
  • Is the Dark Ages a fair label for the Middle Ages?
    10·1 answer
  • How did life in europe change after the germanic invasions
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not a problem Sam Houston faced in his second term as president of Texas?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!