The statements accurately describe key compromises reached at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 :
The Three-Fifths Compromise established that the population of enslaved people in a state would be only partially represented in that state’s official population.
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, established that Congress would be composed of one house in which representation was based on a state’s size and one in which every state was represented equally.
Option : B and C.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Constitutional Convention is a major event that took place in 1787. It decided that how America will be governed in future days. Moreover, it ratified by all the 13 states and resulted in three major compromises. They are Three-Fifths compromise, Great compromise, and Electoral College.
Firstly, the Great compromise ended the issue between the states regarding the representation of members in both houses.
Secondly, the Three-Fifths made the enslaved person's representation to be calculated as three-fifths of the white person in the House of representatives.
Finally, the electoral college resolved how the president can be elected.
Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.
<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>
A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.
<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>
They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.
Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866
#SPJ4
He did so by adopting John lockes theory of natural rights. Hope this helps
Answer:
Providers should notify the police that, due to patient care and HIPAA concerns, police (like other members of the public) are generally not given unrestricted access to patient care areas. Patient Consent. If the police request access to a patient, the provider should seek the patient’s consent unless the police prohibit it due. First, the organization must ascribe to a mission statement and a clear set of operating values that represent more than hollow promises, but, rather, establish standards for employees’ behavior at all levels and illustrate that ethics play a crucial role in an officer’s success in the agency. A police officer must use judgment and exercise care in using a weapon or other piece of equipment. A police officer must not: 1) show, handle or point a weapon without justification.” (2). There are two of the most ignored areas of police work are: 1 code of ethics. 2 oath of office.
<u>Does this help, if so, give me brainliest when possible (pls)</u>
