Critics of the U.S. response to terrorism prior to 9/11 claimed all of the following except "civil rights
<span> are fundamental and should never be tampered with</span>". Many still felt this way after 9/11, however.
Answer:
Dynamic Character
Explanation:
the protagonist is the main character
the antagonist is the "villian"
the static character is a character who does NOT change their personality, attitude, and/or beliefs over time.
Therefore, the answer is dynamic character
The Modern Middle East<span> - A Political History Since the first </span>World War<span> ... From Islam to the Great </span>War<span> 9</span>2<span>. ... </span>Post<span>-1967 Settlements in the Occupied Territories 236 7. .... </span>conflict<span> resulted from the outcome of the Arab-Israeli </span>wars<span>, which </span>were<span> a ..... Inhospitable to similarly large urban settlements, the desert </span><span>did</span>
Answer: A. Drastic change in traditional gender roles and norms
Explanation:
Even though the first feminists advocated for a lot of things which they hoped would better the lives of women, they did not favor a drastic change to traditional gender roles and norms.
They wanted women to continue taking care of their families and husbands but they wanted to be able to do so more effectively by being empowered so that they could contribute more to their family's wellbeing. For instance, by being able to get better jobs to bring in more income.
The right to be left alone is protected by the Supreme Court decisions in Griswold v Connecticut and Roe v Wade.
the right to be left alone
<u>Explanation:</u>
The judgment of the Supreme Court in Griswold v Connecticut case slackened the law that prohibited birth control. Birth control was considered illegal under the law in the state of Connecticut from the 1800s. The issue didn’t make it to the court till 1965.
The court decided that the prohibition of birth control wouldn’t remain valid anymore its 1965 judgment. The verdict ensured a person’s right to privacy by finding out that the birth control prohibition law violated a person’s right to marital privacy.
In the Roe v Wade case of 1973 the court ruled that a pregnant woman had the liberty to choose to have an abortion and there wouldn’t be excessive government restriction on that liberty. The decisions of the Supreme Court safeguarded the right to privacy of the people.