I believe D is your answer because of how Sophie must confront her employer to get a raise. A raise was not offered to her regardless of her experience, increase in responsibilities. or expertise so I think D would make the most sense in this scenario. (I'm not completely sure but pretty confident)
Hi, Rida!
The court joined with the school and T.L.O. decided to take her case to New Jersey Supreme Court, later the evidence found was unreasonable and the evidence could not be used. New Jersey appealed the choice to the United States Supreme Court.
I hope this helps;)
If you have any questions please feel free to PM me!
The correct answer is A. The author was confident in her preparation for the tryout.
Explanation:
In the paragraph, the narrator describes her perspective about the tryout, about this she specifies the routine was simple "The routine was easy to learn" and she had completely mastered the routine as the author explains " I practiced so much that I could do that routine in my sleep." In this context, it can be inferred or concluded she "was confident in her preparation for the tryout" because, in the text, most details focus on how easy the routine was and the abilities of the author to perform it.
Answer:
There’s a saying in brain science based on the work of Donald Hebb: neurons that fire together, wire together. The more they fire together, the more they wire together. In essence, you develop psychological resources by having sustained and repeated experiences of them that are turned into durable changes in your brain. You become more grateful, confident, or determined by repeatedly installing experiences of gratitude, confidence, or determination. Similarly, you center yourself increasingly in the Responsive, green zone – with an underlying sense of peace, contentment, and love – by having and internalizing many experiences of safety, satisfaction, and connection.
Explanation:
