Why did activists demand federal intervention in Selma?

1 answer:

5 0

Based on historical perspective, the reason activists demanded federal intervention in Selma is the "<u>Lack of enforcement of voting rights for blacks."</u>

<h3>The Selma March</h3>

The Selma March occurred on March 7, 1965, where many activists formed to protest the <u>lack of enforcement of voting rights for blacks.</u>

Before the match, there have been rules and constitutional rights that allow black to vote, but despite that, many states in the South still deny many blacks voting rights.

Therefore, the activists at Selma called upon federal intervention to ensure that African Americans could exercise their constitutional right to vote.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>Lack of enforcement of voting rights for blacks."</u>

Learn more about Selma March here: brainly.com/question/226511

You might be interested in

Why did southern state governments create poll taxes literacy tests and grandfather clauses apex?

eduard

To restrict the ability of African Americans to exercise voting rights.

The black community had less access to education than whites even after slavery was ended; thus their literacy rates were lower. They also experienced much poverty because of prejudice against them in the economic system of the country, so poll taxes could keep them from going to the polls to vote. The "grandfather clauses" were exemptions granted by some states to those whose forefathers ("grandfathers") had full voting rights prior to the Civil War, so if there were poor or illiterate whites, they could vote freely while blacks (whose ancestors had been slaves) were subjected to the laws restricting their voting ability.

These sorts of restrictions against black voters prompted much of the activism of the civil rights movement that began in the middle of the 20th century.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Are fortifications and defenses the ONLY thing needed to defend a Kingdom/Country?

Licemer1 [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

Natural fortifications also helps defend a country. For example the Alps in Italy defends them very well. Rivers can also be a defensive position a country can fall back to. So no, fortifications and defenses arent the only thing. Nature is able to help too.

5 0

3 years ago

Marcus garvey is best known for

Leno4ka [110]

Marcus Garvey is best known for his activism.

6 0

3 years ago

3. Defend or refute the following statement: "If it were not for American participation in WWI, Prohibition would have never bee

nikitadnepr [17]

With the regards to the statement that if not for Americans participating in WWI, Prohibition would not happen, this statement is <u>false</u>.

<h3>Why is this statement false?</h3>

The movement to enact prohibition was already growing strongly before the First World War broke out.

In fact, before the U.S. joined the war, those in support of Prohibition had majorities in the two houses of Congress. WWI was merely an event that sped up the rate of prohibition and without it, Prohibition would have still happened at a later stage.

Find out more on Prohibition at brainly.com/question/3814594.

3 0

2 years ago

What would be the meaning of progressive era and suffrage era?

seraphim [82]

The meaning would be women's suffrage to bring a purer female vote

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers