Prompt: Should leaders be more responsible than the average citizen? Justify your reasoning.

History

1 answer:

SpyIntel [72]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

There are many characteristics required to be a good leader, responsibility being one of this. This is because, unlike the average citizen, leaders make decisions that have an influence on a large group of people. They need to think of how their actions affect others and how those actions might be perceived. They also need to have skills such as good time management and communication to be a good leader.

They should also lead by example, since their actions and attitudes have an effect on the population which they are governing. Leaders are looked upon as an inspiration and as being able to lead through difficult times. If they are irresponsible, they might not achieve the necessary objectives and might have a negative effect on the rest of the population.

You might be interested in

Which person fits the description. My administration created the idea of brinkmanship—going to the brink of nuclear war to achie

Monica [59]

Mikhail gorbachev would be the answer.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Whose sole function is to provide humanitarian aid around the world

slega [8]

The Red Cross is the answer

8 0

3 years ago

Abraham Lincoln thought all slaves should be set free true or false

chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer is false BC he didn't care about the slave

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which revolution, the French or the American, more completely embodied the spirit of the Enlightenment?

timofeeve [1]

The revolution which more directly captured the spirit of the Enlightenment was the French one. The French revolution was based on three basic principles: equality, freedom, brotherhood.

These three principles were also things which depicted enlightenment as a period extremelly well.

7 0

4 years ago

What it Abraham Lincoln had not been killed by John Wilkes Booth? How would

stira [4]

Answer:

If President Lincoln hadn't been assassinated, I believe that Reconstruction and the post-war era would have been more historically positive and ambitious. I think Lincoln would have achieved more things politically and socially for America, and would have done more to fight against many injustices in this country. Andrew Johnson did not have a positive presidency, says his impeachment. Lincoln had plans, but Andrew Johnson created policies and actions that went against the Republican Party and angered many, like his pardoning of Southerners. Lincoln would have continued to be a great figure for his party and I believe would have provided more as leadership than Johnson. If he was not assassinated, I believe that Lincoln would have continued his legacy and his fight for justice in America.

3 0

3 years ago