I agree with the programmers who think object-oriented programming is a superior approach to procedural programming.
<h3>Why is OOP better than procedural programming?</h3>
In terms of Security, Object-oriented programming is said to have more of a secure based than procedural programming, due to the level of abstraction or that is due to data hiding property.
Note that It hinders the access of data to any member functions of the same class and one cannot see a thing like that such as data hiding in the procedural programming framework.
Learn more about object-oriented programming from
brainly.com/question/12342989
#SPJ1
Global knowledge is like common sense, people know these things, but their may be someone else with the same idea. One person can come up with the idea but their is also another with same so don't give someone to much credit.
Answer:
(i) When transmitting a draft manuscript for a book, the lossless compression technique is most suitable because after decompression, the data is rebuilt and restored in its form as it was from where it originated
(ii) When transmitting a video recording which you have made of the school play, a lossy compression technique is most suitable because the large size of video files require the increased data carrying capacity which is provided by the lossy transmission technique. The quality of the video can be reduced without affecting the message intended to be delivered
Explanation:
Answer:
Please see the attachment for the solution
Explanation:
