SOCIAL GOSPEL<span> was a </span>movement<span> led by a group of liberal Protestant progressives in response to the </span>social<span> problems raised by the rapid industrialization, urbanization, and increasing immigration of the Gilded Age.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
</span>
<span>Toward mid-century the country experienced its first major religious revival. The Great Awakening swept the English-speaking world, as religious energy vibrated between England, Wales, Scotland and the American colonies in the 1730s and 1740s. In America, the Awakening signaled the advent of an encompassing evangelicalism--the belief that the essence of religious experience was the "new birth," inspired by the preaching of the Word. It invigorated even as it divided churches. The supporters of the Awakening and its evangelical thrust--Presbyterians, Baptists and Methodists--became the largest American Protestant denominations by the first decades of the nineteenth century. Opponents of the Awakening or those split by it--Anglicans, Quakers, and Congregationalists--were left behind.</span>
hat depends on the context, if your speaking about the colonization of when the pilgrams came then it started from the East Coast of what is today the United States and slowly worked its way West. In the beginning of the colonization 13 states were made on the East and the Native Americans had the entire west coast. Eventually more states were added as the colonials pushed further West, Their belief was in "Manifest Destiny" which was the belief that the Americans had the Right to move further west and colonize because it was Gods will. good luck hopefully this helps you
Answer: Lorenzo de Zavala
Explanation:
Answer:
The credibility gap in the 1960s and 1970s was a distrust of the Lyndon B. Johnson administration's statements and policies on the Vietnam War.
Explanation:
The term "credibility gap" was used to describe the difference between what the government was saying and what the public actually believed.
Public statements that the President and his administration offered about the Vietnam War were lacking information. They focused on anti-communism and humanitarianism but did not inform on other things that were going on.
