The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the name of the individual who expresses the argument of liberty. Who are you referring to?
It could be anyone, A politician, a founding father, a diplomat, a freedom fighter, a Patriot. Who?
Trying to help you, we can comment on the following.
Doing some research, there is a concept of Liberty expressed by Federalists Founding Father James Madison in one of the Federalist's Papers. James Madison wrote: "Liberty... is essential to [factions] existence”
What Madison tried to say with that quote was that every faction was the product of a way of thinking, of a political belief system expressed with liberty. And that political factions were the result of the ideas of men who freely decided what could be the best for the country and that is why they formed factions or political parties, to support these ideas and present them to the American people.
Answer:
As there is no image to explain from I will briefly describe various effects of Colombian Exchange:
The Exchange was of species and crops between New World and Old World. This had many effects some positive and some negative on both Worlds.
A positive effect was that new crops and species were introduced to both while there were some diseases brought to Native Americans which they had no immunity against resulting in fatalities. Another negative effect was the removal of Native Americans for the economic needs of Europeans leading to death of many
Explanation:
We all had equal protection from the war, but only if we knew how to use it.
Answer/Explanation:
Church gradually became a defining institution of the Roman Empire. Emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan in 313 proclaiming toleration for the Christian religion, and convoked the First Council of Nicaea in 325 whose Nicene Creed included belief in "one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church". Emperor Theodosius I made Nicene Christianity the state church of the Roman Empire with the Edict of Thessalonian of 380.
After the fall of the Roman Empire in the 5th century, there emerged no single powerful secular government in the West. There was however a central ecclesiastical power in Rome, the Catholic Church. In this power vacuum, the Church rose to become the dominant power in the West. The Church started expanding in the beginning 10th century, and as secular kingdoms gained power at the same time, there naturally arose the conditions for a power struggle between Church and Kingdom over ultimate authority.
In essence, the earliest vision of Christendom was a vision of a Christian theocracy, a government founded upon and upholding Christian values, whose institutions are spread through and over with Christian doctrine. In this period, members of the Christian clergy wield political authority. The specific relationship between the political leaders and the clergy varied but, in theory, the national and political divisions were at times subsumed under the leadership of the Catholic Church as an institution. This model of Church–State relations was accepted by various Church leaders and political leaders in European history.
The classical heritage flourished throughout the Middle Ages in both the Byzantine Greek East and the Latin West. In the Greek philosopher Plato's ideal state there are three major classes, which was representative of the idea of the "tripartite soul", which is expressive of three functions or capacities of the human soul: "reason", "the spirited element", and "appetites" (or "passions"). Will Durant made a convincing case that certain prominent features of Plato's ideal community were discernible in the organization, dogma and effectiveness of "the" Medieval Church in Europe.
Answer: Some new territories went both above and below the line of compromise.
Explanation:
The Missouri Compromise divided Northern and Southern states on the slaves issue. The compromised passed as law in 1820, <u>it forbade slavery in Louisiana and it considered Missouri as a slave state. Anything north the 36/30 parallel was considered slave free.</u>
However, since the state of Missouri was considered a slave state, the South had one state more than the North and it was considered that the slave states had more power, because a slave counted as 3/5 of a person.
Thomas Jefferson predicted that dividing the country between slave and slave free states would lead the country to civil war.
