1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ANTONII [103]
3 years ago
11

How did new england settlers justify taking over indian land?

History
1 answer:
Rufina [12.5K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Indians made no use of it,

Explanation:

Puritan minister in Boston justifies the colonists' acquiring Indian land for little to no payment. “The Indians made no use of it,” he asserts, “but for Hunting.” own Blood to drink, in lieu of what they had most barbarously shed of their Neighbour

You might be interested in
How might the Reconquista have affected Spain's economic and cultural life?
Ivenika [448]
It would be <span>C.Expelling Jews and Muslims, including businessmen, probably weakened the economy and made the culture less diverse.
</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did private businesses in the US partake in the production of war goods
Nataly [62]

Answer:

0000000000000000000000000000

5 0
3 years ago
Under which reconstruction plan were military districts formed?
Andru [333]

Answer:

under Johnson's

am an African

7 0
3 years ago
Which factor most directly resulted in Great Britain entering world war l
cupoosta [38]

The correct answer is: German troops invaded France through Belgium on August 4th, 1914, as part of the Schlieffen Plan.

Not only had Britain promised to defend Belgium under the Treaty of London of 1839, moreover German control of Belgium would have been seen as a serious threat to Britain.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the decision of Miranda v. Arizona impact due process for accused persons
eduard

Answer:

Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which minor party’s role in the 2000 presidential election contributed to the defeat of the Democratic party candidate?
    12·2 answers
  • What did the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 accomplish
    8·1 answer
  • How did second industrialization affect all workers?
    15·1 answer
  • The upheavals that began with the French Revolution hampered economic development in continental Europe by
    10·1 answer
  • How did easy credit contribute to the great depression?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Stephan Vasilievich Chervonenko write this passage in his diary? Someone PLEASE help me :(
    10·1 answer
  • When was the declaration of independence ratified?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did totalitarian governments control culture, such as books and films? to ensure that all citizens had access to the arts to
    12·1 answer
  • Ano ang mga bagay na nagawa ng mga monghe sa pagpapalaganap ng kristiyanismo?​
    8·2 answers
  • Call-and-response songs helped enslaved laborers in plantation fields because they transmitted instructions about what to do. es
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!