The answer is D , fragament
Assuming your exhibition is held at a science fair and you chose the theme of environmental sustainability, the title could be "Sustainability, a mission for all".
<u>How to make an effective </u><u>exhibition</u><u>?</u>
choose a subject that is relevant to society and manages to attract the attention of the target market. when choosing a theme related to environmental protection for example, you can use distinctive media and resources, along with posters, snap shots and sounds to create public engagement.
therefore, it's far essential that during an exhibition there are elements that generate interest and curiosity, similarly to an goal presentation and supported by means of dependable resources.
Find out more about exhibition here:
brainly.com/question/5084403
#SPJ4
The subject of the independent clause in the sentence we are analyzing here is "The only people", and the verb is "were", as further explained below.
<h3>What is an independent clause?</h3>
An independent clause is a group of words that has a subject and a predicate. It conveys a full thought, which means it can be completely understood, without the need for other clauses.
The sentence we are analyzing here contains one independent clause and two subordinate clauses. The problem is that one of those subordinate clauses is placed between the subject and the verb of the independent clause, which makes it a bit confusing:
- Independent clause: The only people were a few Tarrageishan cannibals.
- First subordinate clause: who witnessed Duncan's misadventure.
- Second subordinate clause: who happened to be passing by.
Now that we know which one is the independent clause, we can easily identify its subject and verb:
- Subject - The only people.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the answer provided above is correct.
Learn more about independent clauses here:
brainly.com/question/25322033
#SPJ1
Lets read each sentence and determine which one has an opinion in it.
1) Thomas Paine believed that reconoiliation with Britain was no longer possible. This can be proved because others beliefs are sometimes said aloud or conveyed in such a way they can be proven true.
2) Reconciliation had been attempted and had failed. This can be proven aswell.
3) It was unfortunate that Paine called for action. You cannot proove that this was unfortunate. This is most likely the answer.
4) He urged the colonists to take up arms against the British. This is clearly a fact, there is proof somewhere that this happened.
Your best option here is 3. You cannot prove that it was unfortunate from every perspective possible.
B. Grammer is spelled incorrectly , it should be grammar.
