1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
My name is Ann [436]
2 years ago
9

Please help me give two pros and cons for Texas annexation and what’s the best choice

History
1 answer:
Tju [1.3M]2 years ago
7 0
Pros are
-the annexation of texas would greatly expand the territory of the united states
-the annexation of texas would help the united states accomplish its goal of manifest destiny
cons are
the annexation of texas could spark a war with mexico
the annexation of texas, a slave state, would disrupt the balance of free and slave states

Personally I think the better choice would be to not do the annexation because if it was to happen it would’ve messed up the slave to no slave state ratio
You might be interested in
What form of entertainment was inspired by religion?
AysviL [449]

The answer to this is A. Chautauqua Circuit.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Poster "B" would infuriate, or anger, which person or group of people PLEASE HELP!
Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer: I think it would anger people who do not own slaves

(tell me if I’m wrong please)

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which statement best explains the pharaoh's role in the economy?
Assoli18 [71]

Answer:

The pharaoh owned all land and wealth.

Explanation:

While Pharaoh also served as a religious leader in ancient Egypt, his roles in the economy of Egypt includes the following:

1. He collected taxes

2. He controlled all the lands in Egypt. Part of his title is 'Lord of the Two Lands' as he controlled upper Egypt and lower Egypt altogether.

3. He made laws including those relating to economic policies.

Hence, Pharaoh's role in the economy can be considered to be "The pharaoh owned all land and wealth."

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Henry Cabot Lodge and other senators opposed
Ksenya-84 [330]
Henry Cabot Lodge and other senators opposed ratification of the Treaty of Versailles (1919) because they believed the treaty 3. could draw the United States into future conflicts. Remember that the period of international involvement marked by Woodrow Wilson's presidency and World War I was a new situation for the previously isolated United States. A great number of policymakers still advocated that idea of isolationism - avoiding involvement abroad. While they were able to block the ratification of the Versailles Treaty, the United States would continue to become more and more involved in international affairs as the century progressed.
4 0
3 years ago
The english language has many ______ from groups or cultures
rjkz [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

Variations

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Como eum.edsunuty com/Play
    12·1 answer
  • Why did Christianity become so widely accepted?
    6·2 answers
  • How many states existed at the time of the Constitutional Convention
    7·2 answers
  • Imagine that you're a geographer who studies the Earth's physical features. You've noticed that there have been many volcanic er
    13·1 answer
  • How did the one-child policy result in large numbers of undocumented Chinese?
    10·2 answers
  • The Battle of ______ proved to be the single bloodiest day in American history.
    9·2 answers
  • Challenges facing Greek farmers
    7·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
    8·2 answers
  • HELP PLEASE!
    10·1 answer
  • The following definitions are correct:
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!