B. Reducing taxes
Expansionary policies seek to encourage economic growth. Governments pursuing an expansionary policy will cut taxes in order to stimulate investment and production by businesses and economic activity by consumers. The idea is that by putting more money back into the pockets of taxpayers (whether corporations or individuals), they will respond by using the dollars not paid in taxes in ways that will generate greater levels of economic activity in the country.
In December 2017, the US Congress (led by Republicans) passed a major tax cut package, which reduced tax rates on corporations from 35% to 21%, as well as lowering individual income tax rates. It remains to be seen, however, how well the tax cut policy will work to improve overall economic well-being in America. Much of the benefit goes to stockholders and investors, more so than to workers. Market Mogul reported in April, 2018, that while <span>Walmart announced it would spend $700 million on job creation and higher wages, that amount is very small compared to the $4 billion that Walmart plans to use to increase its stock value and benefit its investors, shareholders, and executives. So a major argument continues to be debated, as to which sectors of the economy are helped by an expansionary tax policy.</span>
Nativism is the policy of protecting the interests of native-born or established against those of immigrants. Some Americans dislike immigrants because immigrants take things that are given to them for granted
Answer: land grants opened new areas and attracted new settlers, new styles of buildings included the use of stucco and cement, social changes improved life for many citizens in New Orleans, New Orleans became a multicultural city and remains that way today
Explanation: A,B,C and F
After the war<span>, the South </span>featured<span> a </span>tough amount<span> of </span>reconstruction<span> its government and economy and </span>managing<span> more than </span>3<span> million </span>new<span> freed African Americans. The tragedy of Reconstruction was that blacks and whites who</span><span> tried </span>to make an additional populist<span> society </span>within the<span> South were lacking the resources which were needed to achieve their goals</span><span>.
S</span>everal<span> slaves who</span><span> had been cramped all their lives had no "where" to go.
Although they were </span>delighted to be free,the nice day of rejoicing<span>,</span><span>but this new state of freedom </span>conjointly caused uncertainty<span>. Some stayed on </span>recent<span> plantations, others floated off in search of lost family. S</span>everal<span> slave </span>house owners<span> were glad </span>to urge obviate " <span>oppressive</span><span> slaves" and threw them out "just like </span>american<span> capitalists." Some former slaves, </span>particularly<span> in cities like Charleston, enjoyed their freedom in </span>ways, which<span> the white people </span>thought were ill-mannered<span>, they </span>placed on fancy garments, marched through the streets and showed none of their former divergent perspectives toward their late masters.
............................................................................
