Answer:
No.
Explanation:
Vaccines are one of humanities greatest inventions in preserving the longevity of life in humanity's over-arching goal to live forever. As of this case, we are not going to argue how vaccines have advantages/disadvantages, but whether or not a person has the right to take it or not based on their own personal opinion and health.
In this case, vaccines should not be forced upon anybody. Humanities greatest individual power that we all pride ourselves in is simply the fact that we have "free will" within the legitimate boundaries of possibilities and our frame of mind and security. Especially in the US (if it is your case), Americans citizens are placed above that of the governmental institutions, which the founding fathers have placed below to serve the people, and that they should not relinquish the rights of those they serve.
The argument here is that those who are unvaccinated should not impede on the rights of those who are vaccinated. However, the fallacy of this argument is that of the vaccine itself. If it was supposed to work as intended, then the person is safe, regardless of whether they are exposed or not. The vaccine's job is to help the person create antibodies from the weakened or dead cells, as for preparation for the actual virus invasion if it were to happen. Therefore, as long as they take the updated vaccine, they would have a dying chance of catching the disease, and a even smaller chance of dying from it. A person's job is to take care of themselves, and if they think the risk of the side effects of vaccines is greater then that of obtaining the virus, then they will forego the vaccine.
The Jacobson v. Massachusetts would inevitably be brought up as a means in which one should be vaccinated simply out of public good will rather then personal beliefs, but, in the 117 years following, technology have already improved drastically, and if need be, there are other ways for students to be able to learn.
Herd immunity also exist. As long as the dissention is not the majority, the likeliness of diseases to spread from person to person would drastically drop, allowing those who believe it is not worth to take the vaccine to still, in a sense, be protected.
Finally, we must touch base on our medical institution. While it is expensive, it has come a long way in helping preserve a person's life. If they really choose to not vaccinate and come down with the disease, there are many different types of treatment options for many of the diseases, and if the person's immune system is strong enough, they may be able to recover.
In the end, vaccines, one of humanity's greatest achievements, should be treated as such. For those who believes in it, to be able to use it.
