Answer:
A. " . . . they [the children] made fun of him because he would not play games or fly kites, or because he mispronounced some word. . ."
Explanation:
'Tiger-Tiger' is a part of the collective stories in 'The Jungle Book' written by Rudyard Kipling. In this story, Mowgli leaves the jungle and decides to go live in human society, after driving the Sher Khan out of the jungle. When Mowgli comes to a village, he gets adopted by a wealthy family, who lost their son.
The theme that the rules of society don't benefit the needs of the individual is developed in option A. Mowgli is a jungle boy, brought up by a wolf pack in jungle, now he lives among human, his own kind, but, in both cases Mowgli remained an outcast. In jungle he was weak among the animals and the beast, but among humans he proved to be as strong as a bull.
In the statement, in option A, the narrator describes how the rules of society didn't fit Mowgli. When he was in jungle he learned to control his temperament. But when children made fun of him, he wanted to break them in two pieces.
Therefore, option A is correct.
You wake up tomorrow and discover you are either blind or deaf.
Argument for losing sight -
You would have the memories of what things look liked, color and descriptions would make sense and you would be able to follow conversations easily. You could learn braille to read and have devices to read to you.
Argument against losing sight -
You would not really have any idea of what was in the room with you. Fear would probably be more common as you can't see the unknown. You would have to rely on others for many things. You would have to learn how to detect emotion through sound. You would never get to see anything new (art, movies, pictures etc). You will never see your children/grandchildren grow up, get married etc.
Argument for losing hearing -
You could see everything around you and you could learn lip reading etc. You know what things sound like so you as you are watching things, memories of sound will help follow along. Visual cues can tell you things that hearing can not tell you.
Argument against losing hearing -
You could not hear what was going on around you if you were not directly facing it. Communication with others may be hard since you will need line of sight to read lips. The silence will drive you crazy since you are not used to it. You would never hear your grand kids speak. You would never hear any new music.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
I believe it is C because the thesis is not restated in the conclusion.
Answer:
Whose beautiful ornaments are these?
Explanation:
The possessive nature of a noun is shown by using the word "whose" when asking questions. The word whose" is the possessive form of "who" and is used to ask questions relating to the relationship of a thing or idea with a noun.
In the given question, the noun is "beautiful ornaments". To ask the possessive question of who those beautiful ornaments belong to, we can use "whose" as follows-
<u><em>Whose beautiful ornaments are these?</em></u>
Here, "whose" is the possessive adjective showing possession followed by the noun "beautiful ornaments".
As a way to use nonstandard English
