1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Serjik [45]
2 years ago
10

True or false: Second person ("you" pronouns) should not be used in

English
2 answers:
Rasek [7]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

Generally, it is best to avoid second person pronouns in scholarly writing because they remove the distance between the reader and the writer. Instead, try to use first or third person pronouns to enhance clarity. Most Walden programs and APA (2020) allow the appropriate use of first person.

scZoUnD [109]2 years ago
4 0

Short Answer: True

Long Answer:

Generally, it is best to avoid second person pronouns as it is too personal, and therefore, informal.

You might be interested in
Identify the term that best describes the italicized words.
kotykmax [81]

The phrase "remembering the days when he would have gone outside" is describing the man. Participial phrases always have a participial, in this case remembering and have gone, and these phrases act like adjectives to describe the subject on the sentence.  The answer is participial phrase.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write the meaning of the italicized word.
DaniilM [7]

Answer:

Words that are slanted . An text style .

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Ok, i feel kinda stupid but what is a graphic element
Andrej [43]

Answer: Graphic elements include simple things like line length, word position, punctuation, and capitalization.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Wright about a time u had to keep a secret using two paragraphs
sasho [114]

Answer:People are horrible at keeping secrets. As in, really, really bad at it (no matter what anyone may tell you to the contrary). And you know what? We’re right to be. Just like the two Rhesus Macaques in the picture above, we have an urge to spill the beans when we know we shouldn’t—and that urge is a remarkably healthy one. Resist it, and you may find yourself in worse shape than you’d bargained for. And the secreter the secret, the worse the backlash on your psyche will likely be.

I never much cared for Nathaniel Hawthorne. I first dreaded him when my older sister came home with a miserable face and a 100-pound version of The House of the Seven Gables. I felt my anxiety mount when she declared the same hefty tome unreadable and said she would rather fail the test than finish the slog. And I had a near panic attack when I, now in high school myself, was handed my own first copy of the dreaded Mr. H.

Now, I’ve never been one to judge books by size. I read War and Peace cover to cover long before Hawthorne crossed my path and finished A Tale of Two Cities (in that same high school classroom) in no time flat. But it was something about him that just didn’t sit right. With trepidation bordering on the kind of dread I’d only ever felt when staring down a snake that I had mistaken for a tree branch, I flipped open the cover.

Luckily for me, what I found sitting on my desk in tenth grade was not my sister’s old nemesis but The Scarlet Letter. And you know what? I survived. It’s not that the book became a favorite. It didn’t. And it’s not that I began to judge Hawthorne less harshly. After trying my hand at Seven Gables—I just couldn’t stay away, could I; I think it was forcibly foisted on all Massachusetts school children, since the house in question was only a short field trip away—I couldn’t. And it’s not that I changed my mind about the writing—actually, having reread parts now to write this column, I’m surprised that I managed to finish at all (sincere apologies to all Hawthorne fans). I didn’t.

But despite everything, The Scarlet Letter gets one thing so incredibly right that it almost—almost—makes up for everything it gets wrong: it’s not healthy to keep a secret.

I remember how struck I was when I finally understood the story behind the letter – and how shocked at the incredibly physical toll that keeping it secret took on the fair Reverend Dimmesdale. It seemed somehow almost too much. A secret couldn’t actually do that to someone, could it?

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please helppp quick please!!
klasskru [66]

Explanation:

1. A

2. C

3. B

4. C

5. B

Are the correct answers

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why should a speaker carefully consider his or her audience? A. Most speakers do not consider their audience, just the argument
    9·2 answers
  • Describe the process of writing a successful short story.
    8·2 answers
  • List 50 prepositions
    15·2 answers
  • 2. Short-response prompt (15 points)
    14·1 answer
  • Write a few family values that are important to you.
    9·1 answer
  • Please answer the following questions to assess your understanding of Chapter 14. Research has demonstrated that visual aids, wh
    8·1 answer
  • Help me with english please
    5·2 answers
  • Does anyone knows this question?
    12·1 answer
  • How does the characterization of Fortunato affect the plot of the story?
    8·1 answer
  • 1. The word parched means-<br> a. Sad<br> b. Dry<br> c. Thick<br> d. Muddy
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!