Why did the author of the CON argument describe voter ID legislation presented by Republican legislators before explaining her a
rguments? Group of answer choices to argue that voter ID laws are only supported for racist reasons to associate voter ID laws with older, more traditional voters to suggest that foreign interference in elections is the real problem to show that voter ID laws are supported mostly for partisan reasons.
The reason why the author described voter ID legislation before explaining her argument was to show that voter ID laws are supported mostly for partisan reasons.
<h3>What is voter ID legislation?</h3>
This is a legislation that was done by a number of states in the United states that required the voters in elections to provide certain ID's before they were allowed to vote.
The author tried to show that the legislators were only doing it for the sake of their parties.
Let's take a look at the name: colonies. If a land is a colony, it is a colony of something, that is, there is some other land that has control over it: in this case this was Great Britain: Great Britain had claims and control over the colonies.
