Answer:
The answer is B.
Explanation:
B. That the government they created should have three branches with equal power. Hope this helps!
Answer:
If an improper payment was made during the time that Andrea Jung served as Avon's CEO then she will be held responsible for those payments even if she is unaware of them. Because as the chief executive officer(CEO) for the company their is no way a decision like that would be made without her giving the approval first.
Explanation:
Even If such decisions were taking without consulting her then it is as a result of her negligence and not showing the right attitude to work.
Because most payments in a company have to be authorized by the CEO of the company before the payments would be made.
Go to the store and buy the stuff you need for the project
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
Answer:
C) is the real truth letter answer (with all due respect to that religion).
Explanation:
How come? There has been a dispute or possibly 2 or more:
1 There always has been a dispute between the derived division of blood relatives close to Muhammad (SWT) like his nephew in his behalf who people say he even wrote and supposedly made up and recited some quatrains along with the very Muhammad (SWT) when he didn't know what to do when he lost inspiration.
2 those who attributed the "quasi-true" according to civilian and followers by recitation of the Koran by the so-called tradition of repetition by memory which way too later was written down
