The Great(Western) Schism of 1378 CE was a B. conflict between the French king and the pope that resulted in two rival popes.
<h3>How did the Great Schism of 1378 happen?</h3>
The Great Schism happened because the French King and the Vatican got into conflict that resulted in the French supporting the rise of a new pope.
As a result, there were two popes who took up residency in separate locations and threatened to destroy the unity of the Catholic Church.
Find out more on the Great Schism of 1378 at brainly.com/question/2320651.
#SPJ1
The correct answer is A. The division ultimately weakened the empire and led to its decline.
Explanation
By the year 285 a. C. The emperor Diocletian decided to divide the Roman Empire into two halves. The eastern part would have its capital in the city of Byzantium (later Constantinople) from where it would be governed and the western part would continue to be governed from Rome. After this division the Roman Empire was weakened by internal causes such as the corruption of its rulers and the adoption of Christianity as the official religion; and external causes such as confrontations against Germanic tribes and the loss against the Barbarians in the East. Therefore, the correct answer is A. The division ultimately weakened the empire and led to its decline.
They are all artistic techniques
<span>Direct face-to-face lobbying is "the gold standard" of lobbying. Everything else is done to support the basic form. Face-to-face lobbying is considered to be the most effective because it allows the interest to directly communicate its concerns, needs, and demands directly to those who possess the power to do something politically. The lobbyist and the public official exist in a mutually symbiotic relationship. Each has something the other desperately needs. The interest seeks governmental assistance and the public official seeks political support for future elections or political issue campaigns. The environment for such lobbying discussions is usually the spaces outside the legislative chambers or perhaps the offices of the legislators. The legislative arena has characteristics that facilitate the lobbying process. It is complex and chaotic. Out of the thousands of bills that might be introduced in a legislative session, sometimes fewer than a hundred are actually passed. There is never enough time to complete the work on the agenda—not even a fraction of the work. The political process tends to be a winner-takes-all game—often a zero-sum game given the limited resources available and seemingly endless lists of demands that request some allocation of resources. Everyone in the process desperately needs information and the most frequent (and most useful) source of information is the lobbyist. The exchange is simple: the lobbyist helps out the governmental officials by providing them with information and the government official reciprocates by helping the interests gain their objectives. There is a cycle of every governmental decision-making site. At crucial times in those cycles, the needs of the officials or the lobbyists may dominate. For lobbyists in a legislative site, the crucial moments are as the session goes down to its final hours. For legislators, the closer they are to the next election, the more responsive they are to lobbyists who possess resources that may help.</span>
The definition of apartheid refers to a political system where people are clearly divided based on race, gender, class or other such factors. An example of Apartheid is a society where white people are considered superior and people of other races are mistreated.
Example in africa: Though apartheid was supposedly designed to allow different races to develop on their own, it forced black South Africans into poverty and hopelessness. ... It was illegal for a black person not to carry a passbook. Black people could not marry white people. They could not set up businesses in white areas.
