1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GaryK [48]
2 years ago
11

What is one reason the U.S. economy grew significantly after the war?

History
1 answer:
NARA [144]2 years ago
5 0

Answer: Aunque no lo creas para las potencias del mundo como lo es Rusia, Japon, China y Estados unidos las guerras les favorece mucho, ya que al tener tanta tegnologia armamenticia (En armas) muchos paises les compran todo tipo de artefactos para la guerra, aumentando su economia indudablemente, tambien los consumidores empezaron a comprar mas cosas teniendo que ver con la guerra, por naturaleza del ser humano, se compra lo que este a la moda

Explanation: you can traduced it, from spanish to english

Un saludo!

You might be interested in
Describe the differences between the government's early "civilization" and assimilation policies and its later
iren2701 [21]

Answer:At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation: Read this and you'll find your answer~!

7 0
3 years ago
Which action was unique about the 2008 presidential election?
777dan777 [17]

Answer:

I think it would be 1.

Explanation:

Because Hillary Clinton ran for president but got beaten by Barack Obama

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which claim would most likely come from an argumentative essay rather than an explanatory essay
barxatty [35]
I’m pretty sure it’s c. But may be b. Just know if it says “should” or “I” it’s not argumentative
5 0
2 years ago
Why is the Armenian Massacre considered genocide?
Alexeev081 [22]

Answer:

The Germans attempted to keep Armenians from practicing their religion.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Which phrase defines gross domestic product (GDP)?
Helga [31]

Gross domestic product (GDP) is the monetary value of all the finished goods and services produced within a country's borders in a specific time period. HOPE THIS HELPS

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The United States was called the Arsenal of Democracy because
    5·1 answer
  • Select all that apply.
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes an effect of William Penn's actions on colonial America?. . Cash-crop agriculture became more pro
    10·2 answers
  • America's major military and diplomatic institutions were reshaped by the _____ act of 1947.
    9·1 answer
  • Why do you think embargoes against Britain and France failed?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did my dad leave?
    10·2 answers
  • Que cambio y que continúa entre el mundo mediaval y el mundo moderno ?
    12·1 answer
  • 1. Which of the following about Saladin is correct?
    7·1 answer
  • What are the answers for this question it is confusing.
    14·2 answers
  • Which three of the following were outcomes of the Council of Trent?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!