Answer:
C
Explanation:
Its usually the first sentence or the last sentence in the first paragraph and the first paragraph is a introductory paragraph so C
Answer:
I really think that is depends on how credible the citizen journalists are. What I mean by that is that we see a lot of pictures and videos on the news and online that are from people who are not journalists and it can behard to tell if videos or pictures are real. So I would say that it depends on the credibility of the source as well as where the vidoe or picture came from. There are many pros and cons of adding photos and videos taken by regular citizens to the news cycle. Some pros are citizens capture raw footage of events, they are able to capture events first hand, and they are able to footage of an event that most journalists aren’t (i.e. the beginning of the event, sometimes the event itself depending on what is happening, etc.). Some cons are that it takes jobs away from people who are trained journalists, the footage captured by citizens may have a better (has more information) picture or video of the event than the footage captured by real
Explanation:
Muzafer Sherif is a Turkish American social psychologist. He founded modern social psychology that developed several authentic, powerful techniques for understanding social processes, especially social norms and social conflicts. His experimental research on the autocinetic movement has shown that mental evaluation standards are created by human beings and what influence society has on the development of mental values of the individual.
In a completely dark room, a small light dot on the wall is displayed, and after a few minutes it appears that the dot moves. This shift effect is completely inside the head of the individual, and is the result of the lack of a "reference frame" for the movement. Three participants are in the room and watching a dot, it seems to them that the light dot moves, they are asked to evaluate how much the light dot moves. Each participant in the group says accentuously his assessment, and the answers of all three members of the group converge to the same answer. Thus, three groups changed, one said that a high estimate of the movement of the light dot, the second is medium, and the third low. But, the point is, all members of one group agreed on an identical answer. Their statements about the intensity of moving the light dot were given spontaneously, without discussion and encouragement.
A week later, members of the group were invited to individually re-run the experiment in a dark room with a moving dot, giving identical answers as when they were initially in the group. This shows that the impact of the group is informative and not forced. Their individual perception was the same as when they were members of the group.
This experiment has shown that the social world breaks the skin of individuals and influences the way a person understands his physical and psychological sensations.
