Explanation:
Being told what the song is about, helps the reader understand the lyrics.
Because the reader is told what the song is about, we know what the lyrics mean. The lyrics reinforce what the song is about, like how a simile reinforces what a passage is about. Think about this: If an author wrote, "The man was as brave as a lion,", instead of, "The man was brave", this is a much better choice of words.
Similarly to the passage, by using similes in the lyrics to better emphasize overcoming emotional and physical pain, the song helps the reader understand better the message of the song.
Answer:
So, by reading the section, the reader understands that a simile is about two things being compared to one another, like how the song compares physical pain to a choking rain of ashes.
The correct answer is Very young owls grow slowly.
Here, the adverb is <em>very </em>and the adjective is <em>young, </em>so the adverb is used to modify the adjective, or to show a particular degree of the adjective (how young? very young.).
In the rest of the options, there is only one adverb <em>slowly, </em>and it's not modifying an adjective, but rather the verb.
Answer:
D- What tasks need to be completed?
Explanation:
The group found out the night before the project is due that an important portion of it wasn't done. This is most likely because they didn't map out what needed to be completed before the project was started. If they had mapped out all the tasks needed to complete the project, then a part of it wouldn't be incomplete.
Answer: Pythons are negatively affecting the local ecosystem.
Explanation:
Thousand of pythons are living in the Everglades, is just a fact.
Large rewards are being offered to capture and kill pythons, is also a statement. It's not a reason why pythons should be hunted, just a fact on what you'll get if you kill pythons. Of course... there is a reason why pythons should be hunted, but it is not stated here, so it's not the answer.
People who brought them here as pets created the problem. This isn't explaining the problem, just creating a scapegoat.
Dahl thinks that television harms children's imaginations and does not promote the growth of wisdom. He also believes that books are the only means of promoting wisdom and stimulating children's thinking.
<h3>Why does Dahl think this?</h3>
- Because children's TV programs are not informative.
- Because TV shows deliver ready-made thoughts and don't help kids create them.
- Because TV is addictive and takes up time that can be used with other media.
For Dahl, television is harmful because of its inability to stimulate creativity and thought. He said that this was due to TV's ability to deliver ready-made thoughts, highly processed and often manipulated information. For him, books were more stimulating, as they promoted reasoning, searches for information, and logical thinking.
It is common for many people not to agree with this opinion, mainly because many TV shows are based on books and can deliver educational content.
Learn more about the benefits of reading:
brainly.com/question/501942
SPJ1
