Humor is subjective, so for some people a statement like that could be considered as such. Going by that, if we are looking at this statement as a joke then it would be classified as humor with some racist undertones, but it really depends on the context. That aside, I would say it’s racist because it can be used to generalize Asians in a hurtful way.
Answer: True statement
Explanation:
- It is an ethical theory and also a form of consequentialism. It holds an idea in which the greatest good is for the greatest number and that is the most ethical choice that can be produced by those goods. It is often used in business because it is including the benefits and costs of goods.
It has one limitation and that is the future which we cannot predict so we cannot know if or action will be successfully accomplished.
The one who wrote about utilitarianism is Bentham and he says ''The greatest good for the greatest number".
Bullying is the most common type of relational and interpersonal brutality teenagers in school and school-based or related activities. Most schools or school related activities have shown only a slight or limited success in reducing students or those in a school based setting’s behavior and attitude.
You put this question under the wrong subject.
Indirect object but the word sandwich is direct
