Answer:
I have a few ideas:
<u>If</u><u> </u><u>you</u><u> </u><u>do</u><u> </u><u>kill</u><u> </u><u>him</u><u> </u><u>off</u><u>:</u>
- You can kill him off, but the guy who made him immortal can change his mind and revive him.
- He could just die, and that could be the end of it.
- Alternatively, the guy who made him immortal can remove the ability without killing him.
<u>If you don't kill him off:</u>
- He could be shown a new purpose in life, where he can use his powers of immortality for the good of humanity.
- The immortality can be removed, but there will be a major cost, and the guy might soon regret giving up his abilities.
- You can have the guy who made him immortal, refuse to do anything about the situation.
- Or you can also make him "agree to do it" but never ends up doing it. (This can cause more interesting things to occur between, both the immortal guy and the guy who made him immortal. Such as the guy finding ways to cope with his immortality, the immortal guy loathing the guy who turned him immortal, and even the guy who made the other one immortal, promising "to make things right" even though he's not planning to keep his word.)
Hope this helps you friend :)
And if you want more ideas, hmu in comments or something.
Answer:
arrondissement would be a word with double rs and ss
Explanation:
Hope this helps!:)
The inference shows that Ackerman was successful in answering what dream state is love.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
It should be noted that an inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced based on the evidence given.
In this case, Ackerman was successful in answering what dream state is love. He stated that love is the great intangible. She also used adjectives to describe love.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
Answer:
Why tho
????? w dwd wdwd wd wd wd wd :)
Answer:
c is correct
Explanation:
CD is concrete details, and concrete details help prove and back up your argument with facts