What is the author's reason for ending the story with the dialogue between George and Hazel? Question 3 options: This ending put
s reader's minds at ease because things go back to normal for the Bergerons. Vonnegut intended to reinforce the importance of total equality by highlighting how well Hazel and George handled the death of their son. The ending shows how this society has stripped its citizens of their humanity. They completely forget what happened and go about their loves. Vonnegut intended to show readers that violence is effective in controlling the citizens.
The dialogue was vital in the story as C. The ending shows how this society has stripped its citizens of their humanity.
<h3>What is a dialogue?</h3>
It can be deduced that a dialogue simply means th conversation that exists between the characters in a story.
In this case, the author's reason for ending the story with the dialogue between George and Hazel was to shows how this society has stripped its citizens of their humanity.
This is necessary in order to move the plot in the story forward.
As a professional actress, I believe that C) is the correct answer. A, B, and D are allowed, but not recommended by authors. The directors do have the right to interpret the story any which way they want.
Africa running out of lions is an issue that need to be solved because Lions are important to Africa's population these fierce creature's are known to be the the king's of the pride but there ill be no kings without no lions. Why people agree this issue be solved because as i say these lions are very important to Africa's environment and population in many ways Hope this helps:) Please mark as best:)
