The statement about how Karl Marx and Adam Smith are different would be:
Adam Smith and Karl Marx are polar opposites in the political-economic, in such that Smith would in no way agree<span> with a revolution of the proletariat.
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
</span>
The Enlightenment appears as a need to deny the divine right of the king, so the first option offered is excluded. As such, it propagated science, democracy, social justice, a democratic government, against the absolute and ecclesiastical dogma, which includes the secularist attitude and the understanding of the world on the basis of it. By advocating a democratic government that is overthrown by the majority if it is not for the benefit of the people, it means examining and confirming the natural rights that people possess. The Enlightenment does not adopt anything without questioning, examining and scientific approach, which excludes the fourth option, while it is very much concerned with the examination of authority, since the emphasis is on the law of nature, the natural law of the authority is always examined.
The correct options are B. C. and E.
I think the answer is A. American democracy is needed to educated citizens. Because the American democracy is needed to educated citizens to many reformers wanted to improve education in the early 1800s.
Answer will be bolded.
Hope it helped
Answer:
This is False
Explanation:
The Industrial Revolution started in 18th Century England and saw an increase in manufacturing led by the Steam Engine and other technologies.
While this did give a rise to large factories, it should be remembered that modern electrical science only came into being in the 19th century.
Hence, the electricity as we know today came over a hundred years after the Industrial revolution began.
