Answer: FALSE
Actually, the answer to this question depends on whether the clause is reversed or not.
Since we are not told whether the the clause is reversed or not. It is safe to assume that it was retained (i.e. not reversed). So the answer to this question is FALSE because if one takes a true "if-then" statement, inserted a 'not' in each clause, and retained the clauses, the new statement would NOT be true.
On the contrary, if the clause is reversed, the answer would be TRUE, because if one takes a true "if-then" statement, inserted a not in each clause, and reversed the clauses, the new statement would also be true.
That would be (2)(18 cups) / (4 hours), or 9 cups per hour.
The plumber worked for 5 hours because 450-200=250 which gets rid of the initial fee so 250 divided by 50 is 5