<h2> Children & Voting</h2>
Consequences and both negative and positive sides
I think children should not be allowed to vote for things such as presidents, since it's a big responsibility. But I do think, early teens and teenagers (12+) should be smart enough to elect a candidate, and predict the consequences of their election.
If I vote for a person with a dirty history, I should predict there is no reason why he/she should suddenly be a clean person.
If I vote for a person with a clean history, but that doesn't seem to be willing to do or change anything, I should be able to predict that things will remain the same, if not worse.
Even if most children that age, are responsible enough to vote, it's a huge responsibility, and the truth is, newer generations are gradually loosing interest in politics, which means they will relatively become more politically naive, affecting their decisions.
Hope it helped,
BioTeacher101
The purpose of making an inference is so that one is able to elicit a conclusion that depends on facts provided based on reasoning.
<h3>What is an Inference?</h3>
Inferences are helpful because they help to uncover hidden messages in a text or literature. Another way to refer to inference is "to read between the lines"
When a person arrives at a conclusion by adding one or more logical facts together, they are said to have made an inference.
Do note that the text (paragraph) referred to is unavailable hence the general answer.
Learn more about Inference at:
brainly.com/question/26365397
Answer: No, climate change involves a much longer time period. This is just changing the weather
Explanation: I took the test ! Hopes this help you :)
