The 3rd one is the answer
Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because "Tevye's analogy is supporting the idea of marrying only Jews; however, it does not explain
the reason why this is supposed to happen".
<h3>How Tevye's analogy is different</h3>
Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because it doesn't give reasons to why one is supposed to "seek his own kind".
It is good to seek one's own kind so as to avoid the cultural problem in marriage. It helps to solve the problem of origin differences.
Culture is very important in any relationship. In order not to have different perspectives on an issue, it is ideal to go into relationships with people of the same culture.
Learn more about analogy:
brainly.com/question/13978016
To tell your reader everything you will say.
Answer:
Inattentional blindness.
Explanation:
Inattentional blindness occurs when we fail to notice something that is in our visual field because we are focussing our attention on something else. This is useful when we want to concentrate on a task, and to carry it out, we have to "ignore" all the different stimuli that are around us and that do not help with the task.
The gorilla in the study was a stimulus that wasn't important for the task, so the participants didn't pay attention to it.
Not sure what you're trying to ask, but that statement is correct. Using the mass and volume of a substance, we can determine the density of a substance which is a physical property.
