1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gogolik [260]
2 years ago
13

suppose that a couple adopts a child in california and moved to massachusetts. according to article 4, section 1, must massachus

etts consider the child legally adopted? why?
History
1 answer:
Anna007 [38]2 years ago
5 0

Massachusetts must consider the child legally adopted because the law supports it.

<h3>What is Article 4, section 1?</h3>

This states that materials should receive “the same full faith and credit” in each state that they have in the state “from which they are taken.”

This means that the child adopted in California will also be considered legally adopted in Massachusetts.

Read more about Adoption here https://brainly.in/question/194969

You might be interested in
How do you prepare for an exam <br><br><br><br> i need tips please
pashok25 [27]

Answer:

study, and dont freak out. peppermint is good it helps focous.and chew mint gum

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did John Hancock react to British colonial policy?
Nadusha1986 [10]
He faught them and protected his country
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which Oklahoman recipient of the Purple Heart operated a hospital in Bataan and was detained as a prisoner of war? A. Clarence T
Kobotan [32]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
In most elections that take place in the United Kingdom or France, one must be a citizen of that country in order to vote or run
g100num [7]
As long as he or she is registered, he or she can vote.
5 0
3 years ago
Were the Alien and Sedition Acts constitutional or unconstitutional? Did they follow the meaning of the Constitution or did they
lidiya [134]
The Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional as it limited free speech, which is guaranteed in the first Amendment.  If the individual states chose to nullify the acts, that would be a sign of rebellion.  I do not think that the US should institute forms of the Alien and Sedition Act.  It's America. The people here should be free to say what they want to say.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The us supreme court hears about 2000 cases each year true or false
    11·2 answers
  • Did your opinion reflect the majority or minority opinion on each case?
    11·2 answers
  • Why did some christians believe that slaves should not be apart of their religion?
    10·2 answers
  • What did Executive Order 9066 put into effect?
    10·2 answers
  • A powerful committee of the U.S. Senate charged with finding ways to raise federal revenues is the
    6·2 answers
  • What did Nixon believe would be the consequences of immediate U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam? What specific events did Nixon cite
    10·2 answers
  • Following the Spanish-American War, nations in the Caribbean and Central America were deeply in debt to: A. European nations. B.
    10·2 answers
  • Describe 3 artifacts and their significance to the Civil War​
    13·2 answers
  • Explain some of the challenges the Freedmen's Bureau faced in the post-Civil War years as Emmanuel Dabney describes them.
    15·1 answer
  • 23. Which of the following are associated with the Gupta Empire?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!