1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sammy [17]
3 years ago
6

What is the song dynasty accredited with improving in the government employment system

History
1 answer:
olga55 [171]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:The Song Dynasty is accredited with improving the government employment by creating a bureaucratic system within government employment. The Song Dynasty built a strong centralized bureaucracy and regularized it. The important positions in government was given to them. The military governors and the people associated with them were replaced by the centrally appointed bureaucrats.

Explanation: i hope this helps sorry if it doesn't i tried my best :)

You might be interested in
What was one UNINTENDED consequence of these taxes?
RoseWind [281]

Answer:

I don't know sorry so so sorry

3 0
3 years ago
In general, the Mughal Empire supported
ohaa [14]
Answer A. Women’s rights
4 0
3 years ago
How did competition for land in north america lead to the french and indian war?
kogti [31]
The British colonist swere competing with French colonists for trade, land, and resources which reaulted in a war
3 0
4 years ago
How successfully the governments and economies of the North and South responded to the pressure of war ?
son4ous [18]
They were very successful
8 0
4 years ago
In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), why did the Supreme Court rule that Georgia did not have the authority to remove the Cherokees f
adell [148]

The correct option is: "Only federal law, not state law, applies to American Indian individuals."

When Georgia wanted to extend state laws on Cherokee tribal lands, the matter reached the Supreme Court of the United States. In the Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831), the Marshall Court ruled that the Cherokees were not a sovereign and independent nation, and therefore refused to hear the case. However, in Worcester v. State of Georgia (1832), the Court ruled that Georgia could not impose its laws in Cherokee territory, since only the national government - and not the state governments - had authority in Indian affairs.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A confederate victory at antietam in september 1862 probably would have won the confederacy independence because
    12·1 answer
  • What problems did the roman empire and the roman republic both face
    9·1 answer
  • How was the scientific revolution limited by religion?
    12·1 answer
  • What were two reasons to be a loyalists
    9·1 answer
  • What social impact did the total war have on unions and workers and women?
    9·1 answer
  • Demands of the g77 groups​
    5·1 answer
  • Makayla will u marry me I love you?​
    11·1 answer
  • Plssssss helpppppp!!?!?!??????!!!!! I will give brainliest
    10·1 answer
  • Shay's Rebellion showed:
    9·2 answers
  • Which statement highlights the impact of the automobile? Which statement highlights the impact of the automobile? improved mass
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!