Answer:
- The Great Compromise (also known as the Connecticut Compromise)
- The Three-Fifths Compromise
The two compromises affected the way a state's representation in Congress would be determined.
Explanation:
Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.
The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
A. Existence of social classes...Under capitalism those who collect another's funds in a voluntary transaction become rich (if they also run their business with a high enough profit margin) whereas under socialism: A "family" (like LBJ's and their Democrat FCC broadcast monopoly "licenses") is "granted" special privileges by the "rulers" and end up from nothing to the 100's of millions
The answer is Civilrights i do beleive
McChulloch v. Maryland (1819), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had the implied power to create the Second Bank of the United States, and Maryland could not tax it.
