I’m so sorry if i’m wrong but for the first question i believe the answer is 2 and for the second question i believe it’s 1
Answer:
This question is incomplete. Here is the complete question:
After reading a novel set and written during the English Civil War, you are tasked with writing a literary criticism of the work. Which approach would be the most fitting?
A. Reader-response
B. Biographical
C. Ecocriticism
D. New Historicism
Explanation:
The correct answer is option D. New Historicism.
Neohistoricism follows the idea that a text should be considered as something that comes from a time, place, and from the way it was written, and not as a specific type of text.
Here an attempt was made to understand a history from its provenance, the time in which it developed, understanding the culture from which it comes and an intellectual analysis through literature.
Given this information, we can say that the correct answer is option D.
<span>Macbeth’s guilt is seen when he cannot enjoy the success he
has gain with taking the throne and killing the king. This is one sign of Macbeth’s guilt over his
actions. Even as he begins killing those
he sees as a threat to his rule, it brings no peace to him. His guilt can best be seen when Banquo’s
ghost appears to him at a banquet. Upon
seeing Banquo’s spirit, he nearly admits his crime had his wife not calmed him
down. </span>
The best option to use as the basis for an Internet search of whether the levels of mercury in salmon make eating it unsafe I'd say would be option
B. Is salmon safe to eat?
