After world war 1 (i need 20 characters)
Religious minorities were treated as second-rate beings by the Ottoman and Safavid empires. The Janissary system used Christians as the Sultan's bodyguards. The rivalry between Sunni and Shia Muslims was related to who would succeed the Prophet Muhammad.
<h3>What was the Janissary system?</h3>
- It was a system formed by several armies.
- It was the system formed by the elite army of the Ottoman sultans.
- It was the army used to fight Christians.
- This system led Christians who refused to convert to Islam as the sultan's slaves and bodyguards.
In the Ottoman and Safavid empires, religious minorities were seen as unfit for society. The sultans of these empires forced the people of the conquered areas to adopt the sultan's religion, Islam. Those who refused would be seen as inferior beings and therefore would be enslaved.
These empires witnessed disputes between Shia and Sunni Muslims. These disputes were based on the dispute over who would succeed the Prophet Muhammad. For the Shias, succession should take place within the descendants of the prophet, but for the Sunnis, the people should elect a successor.
Learn more about the Ottoman and Safavid empires:
brainly.com/question/26501400
#SPJ1
Answer:
Promissory estoppel
Explanation:
If an oral contract has been declared unenforceable under the statute of frauds, yet one of the parties has rendered some performance under the contract that conferred benefits on the other party, he or she can recover the reasonable value of the performance in <u>promissory estoppel</u>.
The statute of fraud requires that contracts exceeding $500 in value, or involves the sale of landed property or extending a period of a year or more in length must be in writing and not oral. However, in a situation whereby a party has rendered some performance in the contract that confers benefits on the other party, the other party is obligated to also perform his/her part of the contract under the doctrine of promissory estoppel. The doctrine of promissory estoppel insist that an individual or party to a contract must perform his/her obligation or promise, even though there is not written proof of a contract as far as the other party has rendered some form of performance.
