1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mkey [24]
2 years ago
7

Review the era of andrew jackson’s presidency (1829-1837). How does the dawes allotment act reflect a change in us policy toward

native americans?.
History
1 answer:
pishuonlain [190]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

On December 20, 1836, President Andrew Jackson presents Congress with a treaty he negotiated with the Ioway, Sacs, Sioux, Fox, Otoe and Omaha tribes of the Missouri territory. The treaty, which removed those tribes from their ancestral homelands to make way for white settlement, epitomized racist 19th century presidential policies toward Native Americans. The agreement was just one of nearly 400 treaties—nearly always unequal—that were concluded between various tribes and the U.S. government between 1788 and 1883.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Under the Capetians, the french?
SVETLANKA909090 [29]
Under the Capetians, the French "<span>a. regained territory from the English," due mostly to the fact that the French during this time were more aggressive in their foreign policy. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
During the Great Depression, many families received food from _____.
Viefleur [7K]

During the Great Depression, many families received food from the bread lines.

The Great Depression left the nation devastated. Families were financially unable to scrape up money for their next meal. Breadlines and soup kitchens were established as charitable organizations giving free bread and soup to the impoverished. 

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the paradox as related to slavery in the United States?
EastWind [94]

Hey there!

The answer is A. That slavery was still allowed in a free nation.

One of the things the colonists fought for was freedom. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of the press along with other things.

However, for hundreds of thousands of slaves torn away from their homes, they had none of these freedoms. They were considered inferior and not people.

A paradox is a statement that seems absurd of self-contradictory, which this statement very much is. If the U.S. is a free nation, then why do hundreds of thousands of people living there have no freedoms, stolen from them by the very people who advocated for their own freedom?

Hope this helps!

8 0
3 years ago
How many vegetation zones are there in Africa?
cluponka [151]
There are six of them
6 0
3 years ago
The Taj Mahal was built during the ____ Empire in India.
Len [333]
The Taj Mahal was built during the Mughal Empire in India.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Beethoven cannot be truly considered a romantic composer because he was unwilling to break the old rules of comosition a. True b
    12·2 answers
  • What is the importance of third parties in American politics?
    15·1 answer
  • Which two of the following best support the idea that Harappan civilizations were highly advanced for the time period?
    13·2 answers
  • In the event of a misspelled name, how may the holder endorse the document?
    13·1 answer
  • A power that is vested in the president is
    14·2 answers
  • Soccer (known overseas as football) is a _____________ shared by people around the world.
    14·1 answer
  • Immigration to Texas during early statehood led to —
    12·1 answer
  • How did the conflict between countries affect trade along the Silk Road?
    9·2 answers
  • 13. The Virginia Plan A. Consisted of a bicameral legislature of equal representation B. Consisted of a one house legislature ba
    5·2 answers
  • Que importancia tienen las practicas democraticas para mexico en la actualidad​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!