Question

 PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

Answer 1

Ogden. Gibbons v. Ogden, a U.S. Supreme Court decision from 1824 that established the idea that states cannot interfere with Congress's jurisdiction to regulate trade by legislative action. The state of Maryland may not levy a tax on the bank. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Congress had the authority to establish the bank and that Maryland could not tax national government instruments used to carry out constitutional functions. Georgia, a legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on Native American land. plz crown this

Answer 2

Answer:

Hope it helps :)

Explanation:

Ogden. Gibbons v. Ogden, (1824), U.S. Supreme Court case establishing the principle that states cannot, by legislative enactment, interfere with the power of Congress to regulate commerce.

Maryland may not impose a tax on the bank. In a unanimous decision, the Court held that Congress had the power to incorporate the bank and that Maryland could not tax instruments of the national government employed in the execution of constitutional powers.

Georgia, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on Native American land.