The following sentence uses a straw man argument: "Those who are critical of self-driving cars need to learn to accept technological advances and stop resisting the future."
A straw man argument is when you give the impression that you are countering an opponent's point, when in reality you are "making up" a point that your opponent has not presented. It is like beating down a straw man or a dummy instead of a real adversary.
Here, people who are suspicious about self-driving cars are immediately described by the author as opposed to "technological advances" and "resisting the future." However, few people who have expressed doubts about self-driving cars would say that they are against scientific progress in general. Rather, they are concerned about the safety and the accuracy of the artifical intelligence, for example, but that does not mean that they are opposed to the idea. The author uses this rhetorical device to make his/her opponents lose credibility.
Answer:
Explanation:
To: Conference Organizer at James & Johnson
I am writing to confirm your stay at the Conference Center from August 11th to August 15th. This is a total of 5 days and the conference room will be ready for use as soon as you arrive at 9 a.m. on August 11th. You will have the main seminar room available for your conference, equipped with all of the necessary equipment. The room can house up to 200 individuals and includes the following services...
- Free Buffet
- Air Conditioning
- Full Room Speaker System
- 200 inch Screen with Projector system
- Conference Center Staff for assistance
- Free Drinks at the Bar.
We look forward to having you stay with us at Conference Center. Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information.
A iPod
No idea
An umbrella is very useful
A apple
A pencil
Feedback refers to the message
If it already has the souce before it like for example it says " According to blank "Evidence" You still have to put the parentheses even though it is still there.