The most logical connection between Roxanne Jones and the campaign to change the law is D. She is symbolic of a class of victims hurt by the current law.
<h3>What is a Logical Conclusion?</h3>
This refers to the resolution reached about a thing based on a premise and other supporting details.
Hence, we can see that from the given excerpt, there is the narration of the environmental pollution caused by oil companies and how people like Roxanne Jones is symbolic of a class of victims hurt by the current law.
Read more about logic here:
brainly.com/question/24912495
#SPJ1
Answer:
1 and 3
Explanation:
They already gave us how many pages the book has left.
That depends on the college she is going, who is giving the scholarship and the reason why she is leaving. Scholarships, have nothing to do with when you use it... usually. For example, if the person/company/association giving the scholarship said they would give her the scholarship for her las year of college they have to give it to her for that last year doesn't matter if it took one more year to get to that last one or if she got promoted one year above the one she was supposed to be they have to give it to her one year earlier, but it has to be the last year.
So no, it doesn't matter if she takes a year off, she still has her scholarship she just needs a document that says she is taking a year off and why and turn it in to whoever is giving the scholarship.
The answer to this question is letter A.