1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SSSSS [86.1K]
3 years ago
15

Should victims of a mass shooting be able to sue the manufacturer of a violent video game for a design defect if the shooter had

been a devoted player of that violent game
Law
1 answer:
vovikov84 [41]3 years ago
6 0

The most likely answer is that the victims should not be able to sue the manufacturer of a violent game for a design effect. This is because it is difficult to establish a direct connection between the video game and the mass shooting. It is likely that thousands, or even millions of other people have played the game constantly and have not developed these tendencies. Moreover, even if the tendencies were developed, this would not mean that the thoughts would develop into action. Thefore, it is unlikely that the manufacturer would be considered liable.

You might be interested in
What was the first amendment
yanalaym [24]

Answer:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Explanation:

This is the full first amendment.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the management risks in traffic law enforcement and identifying, managing, evaluating, and monitoring those risks?
Stolb23 [73]

Answer:

Everything in law enforcement is a risk. From the moment you mark on duty until after you mark off city every single action you take is a liability.

The way we manage that (which amounts to tens of millions of incidents and interactions per year) is we try to hire the best officers that are available to us. We have exhaustive hiring processes and extensive training. All of these calls and incidents are highly dynamic and can go from mundane to life threatening in an instant. One single call can save or take a life. That’s why we have a very high level of autonomy. This is not a career field that lends itself to a lot of direct management especially micromanagement. It’s far too complex and far too dynamic to try.

Explanation:

Hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
under Chief justice john marshall, surpreme Court descisions generally upheld alexander hamilton's belief that
Monica [59]

Answer:

D. a loose interpretation of the Constitution could be used to increase federal power.

Explanation:

John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1801 till his death in 1835. Without any prior study in law, he studied law in only just six weeks.

Under Supreme Court's decision under Chief Justice John Marshall upheld Alexander Hamilton's interpretation of the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton advocated broad and liberal interpretation of the Constitution. This belief was upheld by the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall. The Supreme Court uphelded a loose and liberal interpretation of the Constitution could be used to increase federal power.

Therefore, option D is correct.

7 0
2 years ago
Dawn was driving down the road when she spotted a one-car accident and a woman named Sarah on the side of the road. Dawn stopped
vazorg [7]

Answer:

c. Dawn would have been obligated to assist Sarah under the European bystander rule

Explanation:

The bystander rule is a type of rule which states that a person generally has no legal obligation to rescue, save or assist another (victim) who is in danger or at risk, even if the society imposes a moral responsibility to act as such.

This is known as the American bystander rule and is opposite from the European rule which mandates intervention and assistance, the European version of this rule is called the Good Samaritan rule

so under the European bystander/Good Samaritan rule, Dawn would have been obligated to assist Sarah.

6 0
3 years ago
All of the Special Agent Entry Programs of the FBI require that an applicant have at least
Naddik [55]

All of the Special Agent Entry Programs of the FBI require that an applicant have at least have bachelor's degree and experience. The FBI has five admission programs law, accounting, science, language, and diverse, each with its unique set of academic requirements. The application process is known for its thoroughness.

Candidates must have two years of full-time professional job experience. Candidates with a master's degree or above can apply with as little as one year of professional experience. All special agents start their careers at the FBI Academy in Quantico, where they get 20 weeks of intensive training at one of the world's best law enforcement training institutions.

To learn more about FBI, click here.

brainly.com/question/22974868

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • The
    9·1 answer
  • Mrs. Pierce would like to enroll in a Medicare Cost plan that offers Part D prescription drug coverage. She comes to you for adv
    13·1 answer
  • As an attorney for Dudley and Stephens, what arguements would you make on their behalf? As an attorney for the government, what
    15·1 answer
  • In what ways does the separation of powers weaken the government.
    12·1 answer
  • New Jersey State Police intercept a truck load of marijuana during a truck enforcement detail. The truck operator, Bill Smith is
    10·1 answer
  • What is it lol thank u
    13·2 answers
  • George washington was the end of the beginngin of me for today for teacher project for what?
    12·1 answer
  • Police officers are like any other employees in many ways. One important factor is our motivation level. What are the five motiv
    5·1 answer
  • The concept of _________ allows for the limited use of copyrighted material without obtaining permission from the copyright hold
    8·1 answer
  • an injury that occurs while an employee is commuting to or from work is usually not considered to have occurred on the job or in
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!